Light mineral starting point for choosing a target. This is not a prediction of this formula's colour. Select a reference below.

Alpin Heilmoor Extract™by Premium OrganicFor the formulator with an unresolved colour question
Choose your product, compare documented colour references and request a sample with a practical test brief.
Colour references and sensory targets for your next matched lab comparison.
Light mineral starting point for choosing a target. This is not a prediction of this formula's colour. Select a reference below.

Design targets to compare in C0/T1, not measured sensory results for your formula.
Open input: run a blind C0/T1 odour comparison before choosing fragrance or flavour.
Source formula: 0.8% Parfum / Aroma. Choosing an odour target does not change that composition. An unfragranced control needs a separately revised base for both C0 and T1.
Older complete Premium Organic shampoo calculation formula; the separate tested 0.3% finished-product context is not this formula.
Enter a project-approved AHE level to calculate the designated balance change.
Swipe the formula horizontally to see function, percentage and batch weight →
| Phase | INCI | Function | C0 % w/w | Source % w/w | 1 kg batch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | Aqua | Carrier / adjustable balance | 48.700 | 46.200 | 462.00 g |
| W | Peat Extract | AHE | 0.000 | 2.500 | 25.00 g |
| W | Levulinic Acid, Glycerin, Sodium Levulinate, Aqua | Preservation system | 4.000 | 4.000 | 40.00 g |
| W | Glyceryl Undecylenate | Preservation support | 2.000 | 2.000 | 20.00 g |
| W | Citric Acid | pH adjustment | 0.250 | 0.250 | 2.50 g |
| D | Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Aqua | Surfactant | 20.000 | 20.000 | 200.00 g |
| D | Argania Spinosa Kernel Oil | Oil | 0.500 | 0.500 | 5.00 g |
| D | Phytic Acid, Aqua | Chelator | 0.250 | 0.250 | 2.50 g |
| D | Sodium Stearoyl Glutamate | Co-surfactant | 0.500 | 0.500 | 5.00 g |
| D | Tocopherol, Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil | Antioxidant | 0.500 | 0.500 | 5.00 g |
| D | Capryl/Capramidopropyl Betaine | Surfactant | 5.000 | 5.000 | 50.00 g |
| D | Decyl Glucoside | Surfactant | 4.750 | 4.750 | 47.50 g |
| D | Lauryl Glucoside | Surfactant | 4.750 | 4.750 | 47.50 g |
| D | Coco-Glucoside | Surfactant | 6.000 | 6.000 | 60.00 g |
| T | Sclerotium Gum | Rheology / suspension | 2.000 | 2.000 | 20.00 g |
| P | Parfum | Fragrance | 0.800 | 0.800 | 8.00 g |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 1000 g | ||
Boundary: Use this composition as a historical calculation bridge. A 0.05–0.30% light-colour route is a new balance-only experiment and must not be presented as the tested 0.3% formula.
No colour is preselected. A reference documents an observed colour family; it does not prescribe the project AHE level.
Does the selected AHE level achieve pale translucent appearance, refined foam, clean rinse and salon-compatible pack presentation in the complete Shampoo?
A tested complete-product precedent exists, but its result remains attached to that exact formula.
Light mineral starting point for choosing a target. This is not a prediction of this formula's colour. Select a reference below. This is not a shade or guide-level recommendation.
Complete matched base without AHE → Same base + AHE at the approved project level
Request the current guide before batching; do not infer a universal level.
Decision question
A shampoo that surprises: dark raw material translated into a pale, translucent finished formula.

A documented finished-shampoo swatch remains pale and translucent even though the raw AHE material is dark.
Exact appearance remains specific to this base, AHE level, process and lighting.Closest because the same finished-product format has a documented AHE context.
A tested complete-product precedent exists, but its result remains attached to that exact formula.
The format architecture, the closest documented context and the comparison logic.
Use as the closest tested bridge; the performance context remains attached to this shampoo.
Surfactant and foam system · AHE addition and distribution route · Rheology, deposition, rinse and package checks
Treat the level as guide-formula specific and compare it with the lower tested-formula precedent.Best cases are used as decision support, not as borrowed product proof. Customer names, trade names and logos are omitted. The planned AHE level, complete formula, process, stability, safety, package, performance and claims remain project-specific gates.
Complete matched base without AHE
Same base + AHE at the approved project level
One adjusted level only after the target colour and sensory window is written down
Original formulation colour evidence
Vehicle, opacity, pigments, AHE level, process and use state shape the finished expression.





What this proves: a dark ingredient does not force one dark finished-product aesthetic. What it does not prove: a universal shade prediction. Confirm colour in the matched batch under fixed lighting.
For the R&D team turning an idea into its own base
Six parameters connect the creative direction to the complete base while ingredient specification, guide experience and finished-product responsibilities remain separate.
Use the controlled specification applicable to the project and supplied material.
Vehicle, water phase, rheology and other materials can change dispersion and appearance.
Review order of addition, temperature history, shear and homogenisation for the complete formula.
AHE load, base colour, opacity, particle distribution and packaging visibility shape the final expression.
Assess settling, redispersion, use instructions and packaging in the target system.
Confirm stability, microbiology, safety, packaging, performance and claims.
Mapped formulation breadth
Use this index when the selected Studio route needs an adjacent format reference.
| Area | Documented format | Inspiration status | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skin care | Day cream sensitive | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Complexion | BB cream / skin tint | Complete guide formula + photographed 0.25–4.0% ladder | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Complexion | Face powder / compact | Complete 1% guide formula | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Cleansing | Cleansing gel | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Cleansing | Purifying foam cleanser | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Masks | Wash-off / peel-off concepts | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Colour | Compact foundation | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Oral care | Toothpaste | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Oral care | Mouthwash | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Hair care | Shampoo / conditioner | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
| Scalp care | Scalp mask | Mapped concept seed | Open the concept seed; request the current route; validate the complete product |
Controlled handover from concept to validation
Define, select, introduce and validate—then carry the finished brief into the responsible project review.
Set format, target market, sensory direction and evidence question.
Choose the closest published precedent within its actual context.
Add AHE according to the formula-specific phase and process.
Test the complete product, packaging and intended market communication.
For the formulator ready to turn one direction into a prototype